Validity of an android device for assessing mobility in people with chronic stroke and hemiparesis: a cross-sectional study

Table 4 Correlation results between the functional mobility tests and the kinematic variables in the stroke group (n = 36)

		MLDisp	APDisp	CCrange	MLrange	PTurnSit	PStand	Range JerkSit	Range JerkStand	Total time	Reaction time
TUG time	Correlation coefficient	− 0.070	0.082	0.077	,661	-,360	-,347	− 0.296	-,345	,847	0.236
	p	0.684	0.635	0.657	< 0.001	0.031	0.038	0.080	0.039	< 0.001	0.165
Walking speed (10MWT)	Correlation coefficient	0.000	− 0.085	0.013	− 0.569	.287^a	.278^a	0.103	.323^a	− 0.752	− .229^a
	p	0.999	0.622	0.942	< 0.001	0.089	0.101	0.550	0.055	< 0.001	0.179
5xSTS time	Correlation coefficient	− 0.117	0.346	− 0.278	0.367	− 0.283	− 0.162	− 0.435	− 0.411	0.577	0.502
	p	0.497	0.039	0.101	0.028	0.095	0.344	0.008	0.013	< 0.001	0.002

^a Association assessed with the Pearson´s correlation coefficient.
TUG: Timed up and go test; 10MWT: 10-meter walk test; 5XSTS: five times sit-to-stand test; MLDisp: Medial-lateral displacement; APDisp: Anterior-posterior displacement; CCrange: Cranio-caudal range; MLrange: Medial-lateral range; PTurnSit: Turn-to-sit power; PStand: Sit-to-stand power; RangeJerkSit: Turn-to-sit jerk; RangeJerkStand: Sit-to-stand jerk.
Significant results are highlighted in bold.

ISSN: 1743-0003