Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Fig. 4

From: Minimal detectable change of gait and balance measures in older neurological patients: estimating the standard error of the measurement from before-after rehabilitation data thanks to the linear mixed-effects models

Fig. 4

Time course within and between sessions of gait speed and TUG test duration. Gait speed (A) and TUG test duration (B) from the reduced tests. White dots: metric from the first test repetition, i.e. the habituation repetition. Black dots: measures from Trial2 − 3 and Trial4 − 5. Lower graphs in panels A and B report the significance analysis from ANOVA on linear mixed-effects models. Session (left) and trial (right) predictors were significant, while their interaction was not both for the gait speed and the TUG test duration. Horizontal bars mark significant contrasts on post hoc testing. Estimated marginal means and their 95% confidence interval from linear mixed-effects models are depicted. TUG test duration was ln-transformed to comply with regression assumptions. It is shown here as untransformed for graphical reasons

Back to article page

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 1743-0003

Contact us