Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Fig. 3

From: A robot-based interception task to quantify upper limb impairments in proprioceptive and visual feedback after stroke

Fig. 3

Group level Reaction Time and Endpoint Distance performance across trial types. A The Reaction Time of LA individuals (blue; top panel) for both their left (filled left-directed triangles) and right arms (unfilled right-directed triangles). Individuals that failed the BITC (presenting with visuospatial neglect) are identified as square icons. The healthy control performance in each trial type is plotted as a grey rectangle where the top and bottom of the rectangle represent the 95 and 5 percentiles of Reaction Time, respectively. Individuals with stroke were identified as impaired if their Reaction Time was greater than 95% of controls. The bottom panel presents the Reaction Time of RA individuals (red) with the left arm performance as unfilled left-directed triangles and the right arm as filled right-directed triangles. B Endpoint Distance of healthy controls, LA, and RA individuals in the same format as (A). Impairment in Endpoint Distance was identified as being greater than 95% of controls for No Shift, Physical Shift, and Visual Shift trials. Impaired Endpoint Distance for Task Switch trials was characterized by Endpoint Distance less than 5% of controls

Back to article page