Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Table 5 AIC and R² values of candidate models in pilot study

From: Novel evaluation of upper-limb motor performance after stroke based on normal reaching movement model

Participants	AIC			R²
Participants	Fitts’	Almanji	Proposed	Fitts’	Almanji	Proposed
Stroke: Less-affected
P1	335	− 158	− 55	0.570	0.997	0.752
P2	349	− 176	− 72	0.860	0.999	0.959
P3	331	− 178	− 63	0.572	0.999	0.776
P4	350	− 188	− 71	0.774	0.999	0.941
P5	421	− 171	− 13	0.264	0.999	0.768
P6	395	− 170	− 26	0.321	0.999	0.783
P7	326	− 163	− 59	0.599	0.997	0.745
P8	363	− 130	− 20	0.479	0.996	0.515
P9	357	− 148	− 25	0.203	0.997	0.436
P10	367	− 178	− 54	0.385	0.999	0.872
P11	384	− 181	− 30	0.579	0.999	0.835
P12	358	− 170	− 57	0.584	0.999	0.875
Stroke: Affected
P1	352	− 179	− 39	0.420	0.999	0.603
P2	419	− 121	8	0.398	0.998	0.505
P3	334	− 193	− 44	0.634	0.999	0.673
P4	391	− 177	− 30	0.570	0.999	0.828
P5	407	− 156	− 6	0.255	0.999	0.572
P6	353	− 166	− 48	0.584	0.999	0.814
P7	372	− 149	− 13	0.233	0.998	0.295
P8	384	− 150	− 12	0.160	0.999	0.446
P9	380	− 157	− 9	0.208	0.999	0.394
P10	362	− 174	− 38	0.480	0.999	0.769
P11	423	− 161	12	0.023	0.999	0.204
P12	362	− 149	− 31	0.635	0.999	0.733

AIC denotes Akaike information criterion; R² denotes the coefficient of determination

Back to article page

ISSN: 1743-0003

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com