Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical-scales, cortical-excitability (in ipsilesional and contralesional-hemisphere) and interhemispheric parameters in Robotic Group with Control Group

From: Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Groups

Robotic-therapy group

Control group

Intergroup p-value

Bonferroni correction

Outcomes

Pre-Therapy

Post-Therapy

Difference of mean

Robotic group p-value

Pre-therapy

Post-therapy

Difference of mean

Control group p-value

Mean + Std dev

Mean + Std dev

Clinical scales

MAS

1.75 ± 0.2

1.29 ± 0.3

0.46

0.0009

1.86 ± 0.5

1.59 ± 0.6

0.27

0.12

0.03*

0.19

AROM

15.00 ± 9.7

34.50 ± 14.50

19.580

0.0004

13.60 ± 7.70

20.00 ± 8.00

6.4

0.002

0.02*

0.07

BI

74.1 ± 12.4

89.1 ± 7.9

15

0.0009

69.5 ± 12.9

82.7 ± 14.3

13.18

0.0009

0.82

0.48

BS

3.6 ± 0.7

4.8 ± 0.9

1.16

0.0004

3.72 ± 1

4.4 ± 1.2

0.73

0.015

0.311

0.27

FMU/L

36 ± 7.7

50.2 ± 6.5

14.2

0.0004

37.4 ± 9.1

45.4 ± 9.7

8

0.0009

0.039*

0.04#

FMW/H

9.7 ± 2.7

16.6 ± 4.3

6.9

0.0004

11.4 ± 2.9

15.1 ± 3.6

3.73

0.0009

0.012*

0.01#

FMS/E

26.2 ± 5.6

33.5 ± 3.8

7.3

0.0009

26 ± 7.07

29.8 ± 7.08

3.8

0.002

0.13

0.28

∆FM

W/H

0.73 ± 0.45

0.33 ± 0.14

0.012*

0.01#

Cortical-excitability

RMT IL

95.3 ± 7.8

79.58 ± 14.38

15.17

0.0039

89 ± 16.03

85.18 ± 17.9

3.82

0.12

0.027*

0.02#

MEP A IL

39.4 ± 60.4

94.3 ± 63.2

54.9

0.048

38.1 ± 55.9

38.24 ± 40

0.14

0.312

0.014*

0.04#

RMT CL

67.33 ± 10.1

65.08 ± 11.12

2.25

0.051

68.09 ± 11.7

66.18 ± 12.57

1.91

0.052

0.87

0.65

MEP A CL

506.33 ± 247

355.3 ± 191.5

151.03

0.23

200.2 ± 77

185.4 ± 268.3

14.8

0.41

0.65

0.37

RMTasym

1.43 ± 0.21

1.25 ± 0.31

0.18

0.012

1.33 ± 0.32

1.30 ± 0.28

0.03

0.59

0.028*

0.035#

∆RMTipsi

0.16 ± 0.12

0.04 ± 0.09

0.023*

0.017#

∆RMT asym ratio

0.12 ± 0.14

0.011 ± 0.1

0.028*

0.034#

  1. *Shows the statistical significance differences (p < 0.05) between RG and CG, #Shows the statistical significance with bonferroni correction applied
  2. MAS (max 4) Modified Ashworth Scale, AROM (max 70) Active Range of Motion
  3. BI (max 100) Barthel Index, BS (max 7) Brunstorm Stage
  4. FMU/L (max 66) Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb Scale, FMW/H (max 24) Fugl-Meyer Wrist Hand
  5. FMS/E (max 42) Fugl-Meyer Shoulder Elbow, MEP A( µv) MEP Amplitude, RMT (%)
  6. IL Ipsilesional, CL Contralesional, RMTasymm  = (RMT Ipsilesional / RMT contralesional), ∆RMTasymm-ratio = (Post RMTasymm—Pre RMTasymm)/Pre RMTasymm   = Relative improvement in RMT ratio
  7. ∆RMTipsi = (Pre RMT Ipsi–Post RMT Ipsi)/Pre RMT Ipsi (RMT decreases in case of improvement) = Relative decrease/improvement in ipsilesional RMT
  8. ∆FMW/H = (Post FMW/H–Pre FMW/H)/ Pre FMW/H = Relative improvement in Fugl-Meyer (W/H)