Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of outcome measurements before and after intervention

From: Feasibility and effect of interactive telerehabilitation on balance in individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study

 

Control

Experimental

p-valuea

N = 15

N = 15

Median (IQR)

BBS

 Pre-intervention

42 (32–49)

45 (32–49)

0.90

 Post-intervention

46 (32–41)

50 (33–52)

0.59

 p-valueb

0.01*

0.001*

 

TUG

 Pre-intervention

24.83 (16.97–57.59)

26.22 (10.7–48.56)

0.51

 Post-intervention

20.22 (15.13–53.19)

23.87 (9.31–46.09)

0.51

 p-valueb

0.28

0.005*

 

MFES

 Pre-intervention

126 (76–140)

90 (60–110)

0.09

 Post-intervention

130 (73–140)

100 (50–122)

0.15

 p-valueb

0.50

0.77

 

MI (LE)

 Pre-intervention

76 (76–84)

70 (34–76)

0.11

 Post-intervention

78 (76–92)

76 (39–84)

0.20

 p-valueb

0.24

0.06

 

FAC

 Pre-intervention

4 (3–4)

4 (3–4)

0.80

 Post-intervention

4 (3–4)

4 (3–4)

0.59

 p-valueb

1.00

0.50

 
  1. IQR interquartile range, BBS Berg Balance Scale, TUG Timed Up and Go test, MFES Modified Falls Efficacy Scale, L/E lower extremity, FAC functional ambulation categories
  2. aMann–Whitney U test; b Wilcoxon signed-ranks test
  3. *Indicates significant difference, p < 0.05