FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect

Table 2 Comparison of FOPR-SR

	Mean rank			χ2	p-value	Post-hoc
	HSN+SS	HSN−SS	HC	χ2	p-value	Post-hoc
FOPR-SRs from near plane
FOP-SR-Near	15.37	41.30	37.07	24.64	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOP-SR-Left-Near	14.84	41.18	37.64	29.46	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOP-SR-Right-Near	22.89	36.59	35.27	9.04	0.01	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOR-SR-Near	13.82	40.93	38.77	28.92	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOR-SR-Left-Near	13.63	39.36	40.50	32.08	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOR-SR-Right-Near	25.58	41.86	33.45	5.18	0.075
FOPR-SRs from far plane
FOP-SR-Far	12.45	41.07	39.82	31.99	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOP-SR-Left-Far	11.82	40.55	40.89	35.80	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOP-SR-Right-Far	22.89	35.20	31.45	1.59	0.452
FOR-SR-Far	12.76	40.93	38.77	32.17	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOR-SR-Left-Far	12.24	40.66	40.41	35.78	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC
FOR-SR-Right-Far	18.89	41.86	33.45	18.33	< 0.001	HSN+SS < HSN−SS, HC

Kruskall–Wallis tests and Mann–Whitney U-test for comparisons of success rate (SR) between groups and post-hoc study
FOPR FOP and FOR, FOP field of perception, FOR field of regard, HSN+SS stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and with HSN, HSN−SS stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and without HSN, HC healthy control

ISSN: 1743-0003