A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait

Table 3 Mean across muscles Pearson correlation coefficient r values between EMG vs. muscle activations (r > 0.60 in italics)

Subject	Mean Values
	Pearson correlation coefficient r between across-muscles mean EMG vs. muscle activations
	SO-I	SO-II	SO-III	SO-IV	PHY1	PHY2	PHY3	Syn03
1	0.85	0.78	0.74	0.62	0.80	0.74	0.84	0.62
2	0.73	0.66	0.67	0.50	0.70	0.64	0.70	0.64
3	0.70	0.65	0.69	0.64	0.73	0.71	0.74	0.73
4	0.74	0.78	0.72	0.72	0.71	0.76	0.72	0.70
5	0.83	0.77	0.81	0.73	0.85	0.79	0.83	0.60
6	0.62	0.63	0.56	0.49	0.65	0.68	0.65	0.63
7	0.74	0.62	0.62	0.56	0.66	0.65	0.74	0.40
8	0.71	0.67	0.59	0.53	0.76	0.62	0.75	0.67
9	0.79	0.78	0.71	0.64	0.76	0.76	0.79	0.53
10	0.68	0.72	0.60	0.62	0.67	0.66	0.66	0.63
Mean	0.74	0.71	0.67	0.61	0.73	0.70	0.74	0.61

ISSN: 1743-0003