Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, and individual training goals for the AANmDOF robotic and conventional gait training groups (mean ± SD or number)

From: Effect of assist-as-needed robotic gait training on the gait pattern post stroke: a randomized controlled trial

 

AANmDOF robotic

n = 17

Conventional

n = 15

Sex, male/female (n)

10/7

10/5

Age (years)

60.6 ± 9.3

56.8 ± 9.8

Height (cm)

177.4 ± 7.6

177.7 ± 7.5

Weight (kg)

80.8 ± 16.0

79.3 ± 14.3

Type of stroke, ischemic/haemorrhagic (n)

13/4

11/4

Time since stroke (wks)

5.4 ± 1.8

5.9 ± 2.1

Hemiparetic side, left/right (n)

7/10

7/8

Use of ankle–foot orthosis (n)

8

6

FAC score (n)

  

 3

10

6

 4

6

8

 5

1

1

Fugl Meyer Assessment—leg score

24.2 ± 4.6

23.4 ± 6.8

Motricity Index—leg score

63.9 ± 17.0

62.5 ± 26.4

HADS—subscale depression

1.8 ± 1.5

1.2 ± 0.9

MoCA

24.1 ± 4.2

23.4 ± 4.1

UCO—subscale conversation (n)

  

 4

0

2

 5

17

13

Individual training goal (n)

  

 Foot clearance

6

6

 Knee stability

6

7

 Limb loading

4

2

 Foot prepositioning

1

0

  1. FAC score Functional Ambulation Category (range 0–5), Fugl Meyer Assessment-leg score (range 0–34), Motricity Index leg score (range 0–100), HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-subscale depression (range 0–21), MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment (range 0–30), UCO Utrechts Communicatie Onderzoek-subscale conversation (range 1–5)