Quality assessment for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paper | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Q13 | Q14 | % Score | Overall Rating |
(Al-Yahya et al., 2016 )[22] | 1 | 0 | CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 5/10 = 50% | Good |
(Caliandro et al., 2020) [23] | 1 | 0 | CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 5/10 = 50% | Good |
(Chang et al., 2019) [32] | 1 | 0 | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 0 | 3/10 = 30% | Poor |
(Chatterjee et al., 2019 )[33] | 1 | 0 | CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 6/11 = 55% | Good |
(Choi et al., 2016)[34] | 1 | 0 | CD | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 4/10 = 40% | Fair |
(GarcÃa-Cossio et al., 2015) [35] | 1 | 0 | CD | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 4/10 = 40% | Fair |
(Hawkins et al., 2018) [36] | 1 | 0 | CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 5/10 = 50% | Good |
(Hermand et al., 2019) [37] | 1 | 0 | CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 6/11 = 55% | Good |
(Lee et al., 2018) [30] | 1 | 0 | CD | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 0 | 3/10 = 30% | Poor |
(Liu et al., 2018) [38] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 8/11 = 73% | Good |
(Mihara et al., 2007) [39] | 1 | 0 | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0* | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 0 | 2/10 = 20% | Fair |
(Mitchell et al., 2018)[31] | 1 | 0 | CD | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 4/10 = 40% | Fair |
(Miyai et al., 2006) [24] | 0 | 0 | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 0 | 2/10 = 20% | Poor |
(Miyai et al., 2006) [25] | 1 | 0 | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 4/10 = 40% | Fair |
(Mori et al., 2018) [26] | 1 | 0 | CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 5/10 = 50% | Fair |
(Saitou et al., 2000) [27] | 1 | 0 | CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | NA | 0 | 2/10 = 20% | Poor |
(Sangani et al., 2015) [28] | 1 | 0 | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | 3/9 = 33% | Poor |
(Sburlea et al., 2015) [29] | 1 | 0 | CD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 1 | 1 | NA | 1 | 1 | 5/12 = 42% | Good |