Skip to main content

Table 3 Relative change in the Bowknot task scores

From: Virtual reality-based action observation facilitates the acquisition of body-powered prosthetic control skills

Relative change in the BKT scores (%) Pre P1
Mean (SD)
P2
Mean (SD)
VR1 100 67.9 (9.7) 54.9 (6.1) *1
VR3 100 74.2 (14.0) 58.8 (9.2) *2
Tablet1 100 81.9 (16.9) 68.3 (19.3)
Tablet3 100 86.7 (12.9) 71.8 (14.0)
Control 100 87.2 (15.8) 78.1 (8.7) *1 *2
  1. Mean (SD), SD = standard deviation
  2. *1) VR1 vs Control p < 0.001, d = 3.09 *2) VR3 vs Control p < 0.001, d = 2.16
  3. This table shows the relative change in the BKT scores in P1 and P2 based on the Pre score. There was main effect of group (F (4, 28) = 3.792, p = 0.014). Among groups, VR1 (p < 0.001, d = 3.09) and VR3 (p < 0.001, d = 2.16) showed higher rates than the Control. There was main effect of sessions (F (2, 14) = 176.935 p < 0.001). The two-way interaction between groups and sessions was not significant (F (8, 56) = 1.863, p = 0.084)