Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias rating of studies

From: The effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training for paediatric gait disorders: systematic review

Study

Level

Random allocation

Allocation concealment

Blinding participants

Blinding of assessment

Incomplete o/come data

Selective reporting

Other

Druzbicki 2010 [15]

II

+

-

-

+

-

+

4 ā€˜resignedā€™

Druzbicki 2013 [18]

II

+

-

-

+

-

+

17 ā€˜resignedā€™

Smania 2011 [4]

II

+

+

-

+

+

+

Ā 

Nikityuk 2016 [20]

III2

-

-

-

-

-

+

Ā 

Brutsch 2011 [14]

III3

-

-

-

-

+

+

Time series

Patritti 2010 [5]

III3

-

-

-

-

+

+

Case studies

Schroeder 2014 [19]

III3

-

-

-

-

+

+

Sample issues

Bayon 2016 [17]

IV

-

-

-

-

-

+

Ā 

Borggraefe 2008 [21]

IV

-

-

-

-

+

+

Case study

Borggraefe 2010 [25]

IV

-

-

-

-

+

+

Sample issues

Borggraefe 2010 [12]

IV

-

-

-

-

+

+

Ā 

Borggraefe 2010 [22]

IV

-

-

-

-

-

+

Lost to f/u

Koenig 2008 [16]

IV

-

-

-

-

+

+

Single case

Meyer-Heim 2007 [13]

IV

-

-

-

-

?

+

Sample issues

Meyer-Heim 2009 [23]

IV

-

-

-

-

-

+

Sample issues

Schroeder 2014 [11]

IV

-

-

-

-

-

-

Retrospective

Van Hedel 2015 [24]

IV

-

-

-

-

-

-

Retrospective

  1. +ā€‰=ā€‰low; ?ā€‰=ā€‰unclear; āˆ’ā€‰=ā€‰high risk of bias; f/u follow-up