Table 2 Rehabilitative trends (i.e., correlations among changes in outcomes)
From: Robot-assisted and conventional therapies produce distinct rehabilitative trends in stroke survivors
Conventional | Robot-assisted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Link to ICF | Change in outcome | 1st PC trend | 2nd PC trend | 1st PC trend | 2nd PC trend |
Body structure & function | FMA | 0.81 | 0.41 | 0.87 | 0.23 |
Activity | WMFTf | 1 | −0.64 | 0.76 | 0.83 |
Activity | WMFTt | 0.76 | −0.94 | 1 | 0.41 |
Body structure & function | Mean strength | 0.83 | 0.11 | −0.64 | 1 |
Grip strength | 0.59 | 0.13 | −0.85 | 0.43 | |
Activity | MAL | 0.53 | 1 | −0.18 | 1 |
Participation | SIS | 0.81 | 0.39 | −0.56 | 0.11 |
% Contribution | 31.02 % | 18.48 % | 30.35 % | 21.16 % | |
Cumulative % | 49.50 % | 51.51 % | |||