Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean scores on SHAP, Box and Block, UEFS 2.0, D-QUEST and TAPES for all wrist conditions

From: Flexible and static wrist units in upper limb prosthesis users: functionality scores, user satisfaction and compensatory movements

 

Own prosthesis

Flex-wrist (static)

Flex-wrist (flexible)

Multi-flex wrist (static)

Multi-flex wrist (flexible)

Functionality

     

SHAP

55 ± 17(31 %)

58 ± 11(18 %)

56 ± 17(30 %)

51 ± 15(30 %)

53 ± 17(33 %)

Box and Block

14 ± 7(49 %)

16 ± 8(47 %)

18 ± 6(34 %)

16 ± 8(50 %)

17 ± 7(44 %)

UEFS 2.0

48 ± 7(15 %)

45 ± 8(18 %)

47 ± 8(17 %)

46 ± 7(16 %)

47 ± 8(16 %)

Satisfaction

     

D-QUEST

30 ± 5(15 %)

28 ± 5(20 %)

28 ± 4(15 %)

28 ± 6(21 %)

29 ± 7(24 %)

TAPES

37 ± 7(18 %)

36 ± 7(19 %)

35 ± 6(18 %)

36 ± 5(15 %)

37 ± 7(20 %)

  1. Note: Scores are presented as mean ± s.d. (standard deviation) with coefficient of variation in parentheses. Higher scores on SHAP, Box and Block and UEFS 2.0 reflect better functionality. Higher scores on D-QUEST and TAPES reflect higher satisfaction