Skip to main content

Table 1 Parameters used and selections made during the measurements

From: Comparison of eye tracking, electrooculography and an auditory brain-computer interface for binary communication: a case study with a participant in the locked-in state

 

Session

Sequences

Possible choices

Selections

EOG

    

    Day 1

    

       - control signal: looking to the left and back to the center

       - one electrode placed next to the outer canthus of the left eye

       - 1000 ms classification window

 
 

Training

10

2

2 runs

 

1.1

1

2

6

       - classification window changed to 2000 ms

 
 

1.2

1

2

14

 

Training

- data from 1.2 used to train new classifer

 

1.3

1

2

5

 

1.4

1

5 (A, B, C, D, E)

5

       -voice recording by daughter

 
 

1.5

1

5 (F, G, H, I, J)

15

       - added second electrode (next to canthus of right eye)

 

       - new control signal: looking to the right and back to the center

 

1.6

1

5 (F, G, H, I, J)

10

    Day 2

    

       - stimulus presentation in alphabetical order

 

       - 1500 ms classification window

 

Training

3

5 (F, G, H, I, J)

1 run

 

2

1

5 (F, G, H, I, J)

19

    Day 3

    
 

Training

3

5 (F, G, H, I, J)

15

       - two step procedure to select letter group and target letter

 
 

3.1

1

5(25)letters A to Y

12

 

3.2

2

5(25)letters A to Y

12

 

3.3

2

5(25)letters A to Y

4

Eye Tracker

    

    Day 2

    
 

2

1

2

38

BCI

    

    Day 2

    
 

Training

20

2

8 runs

 

2.1

10

2

3

 

2.2

7

2

3

    Day 3

    
 

Training

20

2

6 runs

 

3.1

20

2

2

 

3.2

7

2

3

 

3.3

10

2

6

    Day 4

    

       - classifier from day 3 applied

  
 

4.1

20

2

4

       - data from 4.1 added to data from day 3 to train new classifier

 

4.2

10

2

4