From: Clinical feasibility of interactive motion-controlled games for stroke rehabilitation
Outcome measuresa | Week 0 | Week 4 | Within-group difference (Week 4 – Week 0)a | Between-group difference (Mean 95 % CI) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention - Control |
FIM transfers, /7 | 6.0 (4.0-6.0) | 5.5 (4.3-6.0) | 6.5 (6.0-7.0) | 6.0 (5.0-7.0) | 1.0 (1.1)* | 0.6 (1.1) | 0.4 (−0.8 to 1.6) |
FIM mobility, /7 | 5.5 (2.5-6.0) | 5.0 (2.0-6.0) | 6.5 (6.0-7.0) | 6.0 (2.8-7.0) | 1.8 (1.7)* | 1.0 (1.7) | 0.8 (−1.0 to 2.6) |
FIM stairs, /7 | 5.5 (1.8-6.0) | 5.0 (1.0-6.0) | 6.0 (4.3-6.0) | 5.0 (2.0-6.0) | 0.6 (1.4) | 0.5 (1.9) | 0.1 (−1.7 to 1.9) |
Motor Assessment Scale, /48 | 29.0 (24.0-36.0) | 35.5 (24.8-39.0) | 33.5 (26.3-39.8) | 35.5 (23.5-44.8) | 2.4 (4.7) | 2.4 (5.6) | 0 (−5.5 to 5.5) |
Functional Reach, cm Unable to do, N (%) b | 24.0 (8.0) 1 (12.5 %) | 25.4 (8.9) 1 (12.5 %) | 26.3 (8.3) 1 (12.5 %) | 28.3 (14.0) 1 (12.5 %) | 2.3 (8.4) | 3.8 (9.1) | −1.5 (−10.9 to 7.8) |
Step Test (affected), number of steps in 15 s Unable to do, N (%) b | 0 (0–9.8) 5 (62.5 %) | 8.0 (0–11.0) 3 (37.5 %) | 2.5 (0–13.0) 4 (50 %) | 1.0 (0–8.3) 4 (50 %) | 1.6 (5.0) | −2.4 (5.3) | 4.0 (−1.5 to 9.5) |
Step Test (unaffected), number of steps in 15 s Unable to do, N (%) b | 2.0 (0–10.3) 4 (50 %) | 6.0 (0–7.0) 3 (37.5 %) | 6.0 (0–11.5) 3 (37.5 %) | 2.5 (0–10.3) 4 (50 %) | 2.0 (4.0) | 0 (5.8) | 2.0 (−3.3 to 7.3) |
6 min Walk Test, m Unable to do, N (%) b | 82 (0–248) 3 (37.5 %) | 95 (0–288) 3 (37.5 %) | 160 (110–276) 0 | 274 (45–306) 1 (12.5 %) | 64.3 (69.4)* | 75.1 (151.9) | −10.8 (−137.4 to 115.8) |