Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the pedaling assessment test

From: A biofeedback cycling training to improve locomotion: a case series study based on gait pattern classification of 153 chronic stroke patients

  

PRE

POST

FU

P *

P *

(pre vs post)

P *

(pre vs fu)

P *

(post vs fu)

S1

        
 

U (%)

31.5 (8.0)

24.7 (9.6)

18.3 (7.3)

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

 

WHL (Nm)

47.8 (5.5)

45.0 (5.8)

43.3 (5.6)

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

0.07

 

WPL (Nm)

25.2 (5.5)

27.4 (5.3)

30.1 (5.6)

< 0.01

0.01

< 0.01

0.01

S2

        
 

U (%)

45.4 (7.8)

29.2 (13.0)

39.9 (13.7)

< 0.01

< 0.01

0.02

< 0.01

 

WHL (Nm)

35.0 (6.5)

43.5 (12.7)

43.1 (10.3)

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

0.97

 

WPL (Nm)

13.0 (2.6)

25.7 (10.9)

19.3 (7.9)

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

S3

        
 

U (%)

38.1 (9.4)

12.4 (10.1)

13.6 (10.6)

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

0.69

 

WHL (Nm)

78.5 (8.3)

36.2 (4.3)

42.8 (3.9)

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

 

WPL (Nm)

35.9 (9.2)

29.3 (4.9)

33.7 (6.8)

< 0.01

< 0.01

0.06

< 0.01

  1. Values: Mean (SD)
  2. * P: Significance level of one way ANOVA (p < 0.05)- Post-hoc: Scheffè
  3. U indicates the pedaling unbalance; WHL and WPL, the works produced by the healthy and paretic legs, respectively.