Table 2 Characteristics of patients of HR and WIT control experiments
From: Controlling patient participation during robot-assisted gait training
|  | Pat No | Gender | Age [y] | Time since incident [m] | Lesion (side, infarction type) | β-blocker | FAC | Cognitive deficits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR control via treadmill speed | 1 | m | 43 | 29 | r. hemorrhagic | no | 3 | Medium attention deficit |
| Â | 2 | w | 52 | 5 | l. ischemic | no | 3 | Medium attention deficit |
| Â | 3 | w | 33 | 22 | l. ischemic | no | 2 | n.a. |
| Â | 4 | m | 49 | 29 | l. hemorrhagic | no | 2 | Medium attention deficit |
| Â | 5 | m | 57 | 23 | r. ischemic | no | 2 | n.a. |
HR control via virtual stimuli | 6 | m | 36 | 5 | r. ischemic | no | 1 | Small memory deficits |
| Â | 7 | m | 71 | 2.5 | r. ischemic | no | 2 | Neglect left |
| Â | 8 | m | 68 | 2.5 | r. ischemic | no | 4 | none |
| Â | 9 | m | 55 | 3.5 | r. hemorrhagic | no | 0 | Small attention deficit, neglect |
| Â | 10 | m | 67 | 2 | r. ischemic | no | 3 | Medium attention deficit, neglect left |
WIT control via visual stimuli | 11 | m | 65 | 1.5 | l. ischemic | yes | 5 | Small attention deficits |
| Â | 12 | m | 62 | 2 | r. ischemic | yes | n.a. | None |
| Â | 13 | m | 68 | 2.5 | r. ischemic | no | 4 | None |
| Â | 14 | m | 67 | 2 | r. ischemic | no | 3 | Small attention deficits |
| Â | 15 | f | 58 | 3.5 | r. ischemic | no | n.a. | Small attention deficit, neglect left |