Table 2 ABF effect on SDA parameters Parameters. K and ΔTc are reported, subject-by-subject, for trials with and without ABF. Percentage differences between these two conditions are also reported. Standard deviations are indicated in parenthesis.
From: Influence of a portable audio-biofeedback device on structural properties of postural sway
|  | K (NO-ABF) [mm2] | Δtc (NO-ABF) [s] | K (ABF) [mm2] | Δtc (ABF) [s] | K % difference | Δtc % difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subj. #1 | 100 (57) | 0.42 (0.21) | 86 (15) | 0.38 (0.17) | -14.6 | -9.9 |
Subj. #2 | 70 (29) | 0.51 (0.31) | 66 (20) | 0.41 (0.34) | -7.4 | -20.5 |
Subj. #3 | 75 (41) | 0.52 (0.29) | 65 (20) | 0.29 (0.12) | -13.3 | -45.3 |
Subj. #4 | 80 (21) | 0.81 (0.46) | 70 (14) | 0.39 (0.14) | -11.1 | -52.0 |
Subj. #5 | 47 (13) | 0.32 (0.08) | 39 (10) | 0.26 (0.16) | -18.1 | -19.7 |
Subj. #6 | 64 (12) | 0.27 (0.08) | 61 (9) | 0.20 (0.09) | -5.7 | -26.1 |
Subj. #7 | 32 (7) | 0.17 (0.06) | 34 (9) | 0.09 (0.01) | 6.6 | -47.4 |
Subj. #8 | 35 (14) | 0.29 (0.09) | 38 (13) | 0.19 (0.06) | 5.8 | -34.3 |
Average | 63 (23) | 0.41 (0.20) | 57 (18.5) | 0.27 (0.11) | -9.3 (9.2) | -33.9 (15.3) |