Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of the evaluation activity performed in robot-assisted rehabilitation

From: Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review

Evaluation activity

Body plane

Evaluation objectives

Aspect of movement quality addressed

Studies

Center-out point-to-point (CO-PTP)

Transverse

Feed-forward and Feedback control

Temporal efficiency, Ease, Smoothness, Accuracy, Planning, Efficacy, Movement efficiency, Inter-limb coordination, Range

[1, 18, 20, 44–49]

 

Frontal

Feedback control, Gravity-compensation

Temporal efficiency, Smoothness

[50, 51]

Point-to-Point Reaching

Transverse

Feed-forward, Feedback control, Perturbation- compensation

Temporal efficiency, Ease, Smoothness, Planning, Movement efficiency

[10]

 

Sagittal/Frontal

Range of motion, Feed-forward and Feedback control, Gravity-compensation

Planning, Temporal efficiency, Smoothness, Range

[22, 22, 45, 52–59]

Free/Constrained/Targeted Reaching

Sagittal/Frontal

Range of motion, Perturbation-compensation, Feed-forward and Feedback control, Gravity-compensation

Planning, Temporal Efficiency, Range, Smoothness, Movement Efficiency

[29, 60]

Shape drawing

Transverse

Untrained activity, synergy

Accuracy, Intra-limb coordination

[39]

Shape tracing/tracking

Transverse

Synergy, Feedback control

Accuracy, Efficacy, Ease, Smoothness

[13, 17, 21, 27, 59, 61, 62]

 

Frontal

Synergy, Feedback control

Ease, Accuracy

[63]

Bimanual matching

Transverse

Somatosensory (Proprioception)

Planning, Movement efficiency, Ease

[19, 20, 64]

Bimanual reaching

Sagittal

Somatosensory, Coordination

Inter-limb coordination, Efficacy, Ease

[59, 65]

Isolated movement

All

Range of motion

Range

[66–68]

Activity of daily living

All

Functional ability

Inter-limb coordination, Temporal efficiency

[7]

Virtual games

All

Functional ability

Range

[67, 92]