Table 1 The 95% confidence bounds of the coefficients of the power law function fitted to normalized response latency and the mean absolute ERROR for each tDCS group: M1, cerebellar, sham
Response latency | a (95% confidence bounds) | b (95% confidence bounds) | SSE | R-square | RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cerebellar tDCS | 3.011 (2.476,3.546) | -0.2806 (-0.4182,-0.143) | 1.091 | 0.4579 | 0.2462 |
M1 tDCS | 3.158 (2.542,3.775) | -0.2426 (-0.3924,-0.09276) | 1.557 | 0.3107 | 0.2941 |
Sham tDCS | 2.951 (2.287,3.614) | -0.1952 (-0.366,-0.0243) | 1.977 | 0.148 | 0.3314 |
Mean absolute error | a (95% confidence bounds) | b (95% confidence bounds) | SSE | R-square | RMSE |
Cerebellar tDCS | 0.1013 (0.07503,0.1275) | -0.3808 (-0.5862,-0.1754) | 0.002164 | 0.3767 | 0.01097 |
M1 tDCS | 0.1498 (0.1086,0.191) | -0.8368 (-1.082,-0.5918) | 0.002198 | 0.7172 | 0.01105 |
Sham tDCS | 0.1671 (0.1212,0.2129) | -0.9265 (-1.177,-0.676) | 0.002279 | 0.758 | 0.01125 |