From: The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
Subject demographics | Computerized dynamic posturography | Rotation test | Classification | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject ID | Age at clinical test | Age at research test | Gender | SOT score | SOT 5 | SOT 6 | MCT score | VOR Midrange gain | Time constant (s) | UVH or BVH |
1 | 56 | 61 | M | 73 | 35, 63, 70 | 56, 61, 45 | 148 | 0.786 | 7.76 | UVH |
2 | 56 | 61 | M | 70 | 52, 61, 69 | 17, 71, 46 | 155 | 0.856 | 6.54 | UVH |
3 | 31 | 32 | M | 46 | Falls, Falls, Falls | Falls, Falls, Falls | 151 | 0.514 | 0.44 | BVH |
4 | 50 | 66 | F | 49 | Falls, Falls, Falls | Falls, Falls, Falls | 161 | 0.86 | N/A | UVH |
5 | 60 | 61 | M | 70 | Falls, 52, 64 | 66, Falls, 79 | 140 | 1.016 | 3.85 | BVH |
6 | 54 | 55 | M | 49 | Falls, Falls, Falls | Falls, Falls, Falls | N/A | 0.109 | N/A† | BVH |
7 | 37 | 39 | M | 46 | Falls, Falls, Falls | Falls, Falls, Falls | 138 | 0.625 | 0.27 | BVH |