Table 1 Detailed comparison of the two classifiers

Acc. ± SD [%]

(75.0 ± 4.6 ^†)

74.8 ± 5.2 ^†

85.5 ± 3.1 ^†

91.7 ± 1.3 ^†

71.7 ± 5.4 ^†

90.3 ± 4.5 ^†

62.4 ± 6.9

79.4 ± 11.7

(89.7 ± 3.5 ^†)

(78.7 ± 10.6)

Sens. ± SD [%]

(73.3 ± 5.4)

72.3 ± 5.7

85.7 ± 2.9

88.7 ± 1.5

72.8 ± 6.7

87.2 ± 7.6

62.8 ± 11.6

78.3 ± 10.5

(89.9 ± 6.3)

(77.9 ± 10.2)

Spec. ± SD [%]

(76.7 ± 4.9)

77.2 ± 7.6

85.2 ± 5.6

94.8 ± 2.7

70.6 ± 5.1

93.5 ± 4.2

61.9 ± 6.8

80.5 ± 13.0

(89.6 ± 5.8)

(79.4 ± 11.3)

N _s

(1)

4

1

1

1

3 (3)

2

N _m

(1)

1

1

2

1

1 (2)

1

Acc. ± SD [%]

81.7 ± 4.1 ^†

87.7 ± 3.0 ^†

98.8 ± 0.8 ^†

89.2 ± 4.5 ^†

94.2 ± 1.2 ^†

79.6 ± 3.2 ^†

88.5 ± 7.3

Sens. ± SD [%]

82.1 ± 4.8

85.6 ± 3.8

99.6 ± 1.2

84.7 ± 8.3

93.8 ± 0.0

77.3 ± 5.1

87.2 ± 8.1

Spec. ± SD [%]

81.3 ± 7.1

89.8 ± 4.3

98.0 ± 1.9

93.7 ± 5.4

94.6 ± 2.4

81.9 ± 3.3

89.9 ± 6.9

N _s

5

3

5

3

1

3

N _m

1

2

2

2

1

2

Acc. Gain [%]

9.2

2.6

7.7

24.4

4.3

27.6

12.6 ± 10.7

Sens. Gain [%]

13.6

-0.1

12.3

16.3

7.6

23.1

12.1 ± 7.9

Spec. Gain [%]

5.3

5.4

3.4

32.7

1.2

32.3

13.4 ± 14.9

p-value¹ Acc.

0.016 ^∗

0.129

< 0.001 ^∗∗

0.001 ^∗∗

0.051

0.001 ^∗∗

0.02 ^∗

p-value¹ Sens.

0.003 ^∗∗

0.988

< 0.001 ^∗∗

0.028 ^∗

0.062

0.034 ^∗

0.008 ^∗∗

p-value¹ Spec.

0.349

0.089

0.023 ^∗

< 0.001 ^∗∗

0.535

< 0.001 ^∗∗

0.062

N _{T r i a l s}

(60)

46

48

60

46

30 (60)

58